News
Home/ News
Australia and New Zealand share a common legal heritage — both tracing their patent systems back to the Statute of Monopolies (1623) — but over time, the two jurisdictions have taken different paths. For innovators filing in both countries, understanding these differences can mean the difference between smooth prosecution and costly delays.
Most brands manufacturing in China still think “export-only” means they’re safe from trademark problems.
That used to be true. It isn’t anymore.
From Ed Sheeran to George Harrison, some of the world’s biggest artists have faced accusations of copying other musicians’ work. These “soundalike” lawsuits are becoming more common — and they can drag on for years, costing millions.
In July 2025, George Griziotis joined IP Solved, bringing over 40 years’ experience, and a strong reputation for clear, practical advice across patents, trade marks and designs.
Australia’s patent landscape is evolving — and not always in ways that make life easier for innovators. A recent legal trend known as the “relevant range” concept has begun to reshape how courts assess whether a patent specification is sufficiently enabling.
New Zealand’s rules around genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are set for a major update. Find out what this means for innovators and the different rules that apply to different countries.
In patent law, a brilliant invention is only half the battle. The other half is proving—on paper—who owns it. A missing signature or unclear transfer can destroy the value of an entire patent portfolio.
Launching a new food product is exciting — but before you hit the shelves, you need to make sure your brand is legally protected. That means checking your name is available and registering it as a trade mark so you can grow your business with confidence.
When it comes to trade marks, timing and evidence can make all the difference. The sooner you file and the better your records, the stronger your position if someone tries to hijack your brand.
