News
Home/ News
(Filtering posts by category: Copyright) - Remove filter
Most conversations about AI and intellectual property focus on copyright and who owns what an AI creates. This week's news out of the cybersecurity world is a reminder that there's another IP risk businesses need to be watching just as closely: confidentiality.
A US ice cream dispute shows why colours, fonts and layouts matter—and how Australian businesses can protect distinctive product packaging.
The Federal Court has ordered major Australian internet service providers to block access to 32 alleged pirate streaming sites before the release of The Odyssey. The decision shows that copyright owners may be able to act before anticipated piracy causes commercial damage.
Who gave AI permission to use your brand, image or work? A new consent registry raises urgent questions about ownership, licensing and control.
In 1996, the Spice Girls released Wannabe. Thirty years later, people still know the song, the name, the nicknames, the styling and the message. That kind of staying power does not happen by accident.
If your business reaches customers in the European Union through a website, marketplace, app or AI-enabled service, two EU regimes now demand your attention.
AI tools are making it faster and cheaper than ever to create logos, brand assets and visual identities. But there is a catch: if your logo was generated by AI, copyright may not be the protection you think it is.
A recent Federal Court decision is a strong reminder that film credits are not just about ego. They can carry real legal consequences.
In today’s competitive retail landscape, packaging is much more than just a container—it’s a brand’s silent salesperson, shaping consumer perception and driving purchasing decisions. With thousands of products vying for attention on store shelves, businesses invest heavily in distinctive packaging to stand out. However, this also makes them vulnerable to imitation, leading to legal battles over intellectual property rights.
