When does “compatible with” cross the line into trade mark infringement? A recent Federal Court decision involving Toyota and an aftermarket 4WD accessories business shows that context is critical. Referring to another brand may be legitimate where it simply describes compatibility, but the way that brand is used can change the legal position.
Using your trade mark is not always enough to protect your registration. A recent Australian Trade Marks Office decision shows why businesses also need to be able to prove who is legally using the mark, and how that use connects back to the registered owner.
Indonesia’s expanding halal certification regime is changing how international businesses should approach trademark protection and market entry. With major new requirements taking effect from October 2026, brand owners need to align trademark, regulatory and commercialisation strategies.
Louis Vuitton’s trade mark win against Molly Tea became a reputational headache, sparking debate over cultural heritage, brand ownership and enforcement strategy. The case shows why protecting IP is not just a legal decision, but a commercial one.
Not every trade mark application gets accepted. Sometimes the problem is the brand name itself. Other times, the issue is how the application has been filed.
Choosing the right trade mark classes is an important part of protecting your brand. We explain how trade mark classes work, why the goods and services you select matter, and what businesses should consider before filing an application.