News
Home/ News
(Filtering posts by category: IP Advisory) - Remove filter
In today’s economy, data is the new engine of growth. It powers AI, drives smarter decisions, and fuels entire industries. But while its value is obvious, protecting and commercialising it under Australian law isn’t straightforward.
We are pleased to announce that, effective 1 November 2025, Patent Attorney Services (PAS) will become part of IP Solved (ANZ) Pty Ltd.
If your business owns UK trade mark registrations cloned from earlier EU registrations, there’s a very real risk they could soon be revoked for non-use. Learn more about why this matters and what to do about it.
When a trade mark is opposed in Australia, the clock starts running — and fast. Opposition proceedings in respect of applications and non-use move quickly, with strict deadlines for notices, evidence, and submissions. Often a party may need more time, but extensions of time are not easy to come by.
China’s surge in overseas trade mark applications tells a bigger story about where its economy is headed. The classes Chinese companies file in most often mirror the country’s industrial strengths and its growing appetite to compete on the world stage.
Australia remains one of the few jurisdictions that requires a patent applicant to disclose the “best method” of carrying out an invention. This requirement is strictly enforced — and in recent years, it has become a powerful ground for revoking patents, particularly in the context of divisional applications.
Electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming one of the fastest-growing areas for intellectual property filings. For businesses innovating in EVs, batteries, or related technologies, protecting your IP is essential to compete in this rapidly growing market.
The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has triggered a major debate in Australia — especially over whether copyright-protected material can be used without permission to train AI systems. Creative and media industries are among the loudest voices calling for stronger safeguards.
The recent Full Federal Court decision in Fanatics, LLC v FanFirm Pty Limited [2025] FCAFC 87 shows how easily trade mark disputes can get messy.
